There is the trauma of
someone coaxing out the small child self, encouraging the small child self
to emerge, getting that small child part to have a voice, show
her emotions, begin to trust, begin to reach out and hold on to a
finger, begin to feel that maybe she matters, begin to feel she is
'real' , that maybe her needs and sorrows and rages and confusion have a
reason - having a person encourage that small child to then attach and
love the person, the person who is being so adamant about how trust
worthy and committed they are, how sincere and loyal and determined they
are to be there for that little child, that person being so
determinedly convincing in how they are going to make the child trust
and emerge and attach and for it to be safe enough- and then
that
person sends an email to say they have decided not to be there for her/that small child part - anymore. Or announces they are
stopping seeing the client.
that is the trauma worse than rape, for me.
That
is the trauma that does not heal. It has happened several times - in
different ways with different people. Each of them I loved and trusted
as only a very small child can.
this
trauma is not recognised by society. there is no forum or organisation
set up to support survivors of it. there is no recognition of the damage
and pain and dismantling it causes me. There is no term for it even. I
have no way to refer to it.
I have wondered about calling it 'rape of the emerging self'. It needs to have a strong label, one that conveys clearly how bad it is.
anybody got any ideas? It is severe 'child abuse' but not in the conventional sense.
It
seems one can heal from rape and CSA eventually, but this particular trauma is more difficult to heal from. The
wounds go deep. I wonder if it is because people refuse to
hear that it is a trauma and refuses to acknowledge how severe a trauma
it is?
No comments:
Post a Comment